Documents  ›  ATP-SG-001

How to spec shin guards without guessing

Shell material, sizing, retention and EN 13061 — the five decisions that actually change what arrives, and the two that don't.

Document
ATP-SG-001
Type
Spec guide
Issued
2026-09-09
Revision
1.0
Reading time
6 min

Most shin guard enquiries we get name a shape and a colour. Those are the two things easiest to change later and the two that matter least. Here is what we ask instead, in the order it affects your unit price.

1. Shell material decides almost everything

Three families cover nearly every guard on the market.

  • PP (polypropylene) — the volume shell. Stiff, cheap, tolerant of thin walls. It is what you want for youth and club-volume orders where the guard has to survive a season and a washing machine, not a professional match.
  • PU (polyurethane) — softer, better at spreading a point impact, more expensive per piece and slower to mould. Worth it on adult match guards.
  • Carbon-look composites — usually a printed or laminated finish over a PP or PU core. Be clear with yourself about whether you are buying stiffness or the look of stiffness. Both are legitimate; they are not the same product.

Behind the shell, the padding does the work your buyer will actually feel. EVA is the default. Density matters more than thickness: a thin, dense EVA layer outperforms a thick, soft one, and it keeps the guard from feeling like a cushion strapped to a leg.

2. Sizing is a range, not a number

Guards get sold in S/M/L, but the factory works to a length in millimetres and a curvature. If you give only letters, you are letting someone else pick the curvature — and curvature is what makes a guard sit still or rotate.

Give us: length, width at the widest point, and the intended calf circumference range. If you do not have those, send us the guard you are replacing and we will measure it. That is faster than three rounds of samples.

3. Retention: sleeve, strap, or nothing

  • Slip-in (no retention) — cheapest, and fine if it is going inside a grip sock.
  • Ankle sleeve attached — more material, more sewing, more cost, and a size chart that now has to be right in two dimensions.
  • Elastic straps with hook-and-loop — the repair-friendly option. Straps are the first thing to fail, and a strap is replaceable in a way that a moulded sleeve is not.

4. EN 13061 — decide before you sample, not after

EN 13061 is the European standard for football shin guards. It sets impact attenuation, sizing and ergonomic requirements, and it is tested on a rig, not by eye. Two things worth knowing:

  1. A factory that builds for China's domestic market works to GB standards. That is not a defect, it is a different rulebook. If your market needs EN, say so at quote stage so testing is priced into the order.
  2. Testing is per design, not per shipment. Changing shell thickness or padding density after certification means the certificate no longer describes what you are shipping.

If your market needs EN or another standard, ask for it with the quote rather than discovering it at customs. It is a line item, not a surprise.

5. Print method, decided last

Pad printing, heat transfer and in-mould all put a logo on a guard. In-mould looks best and costs most; heat transfer is the volume answer; pad printing is the one that will scuff in a kit bag. This is genuinely the last decision, and the only one on this page that can be changed after the first sample without re-tooling.


What does not change the product

Colour. Any of the above can be produced in any colour. Do not let a colour conversation eat a sampling round.

Packaging. Decide it, but decide it in parallel — it never blocks tooling.


Want this checked on your own criteria?

Send us the guard you are benchmarking against — or the spec sheet you have been handed — and we will tell you which of the five decisions above it has already made for you, and what it will cost to change each one.

Want this tested on your own criteria? Tell us what you need to see and we shoot it on the floor. Ask for it →